Rendered at 18:05:34 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
secondary_op 11 minutes ago [-]
1. How stupid you have to be to believe that three letter agency of any country isn't capable to delivering lethal dose of poison so that target is eliminated.
2. It's unclear to this day who actually slightly poisoned Navalny and to what end.
3. As of last week we have on camera confession [2] from Navalny's FBK's Leonid Volkov [1] that it's very disappointing that USAID money is no more. Video's in russian but you are, sure at least care and capable to translate it with AI, and if not even that don't even bother raise your propagandized brainwashed takes.
I have nothing to say about OP linked site other than that it's trashcan of lies.
I don't condone doping in tested sports, but I think there needs to be recognition that preventing athletes from modifying their biochemistry turns most sports into a genetic lottery showcase.
Here is what I mean:
Suppose that two men are born, with identical brains, but very different bodies. Both of them have a single desire: to be the fastest sprinter in the world.
- Clinically deficient values of Testosterone, Growth Hormone, IGF-1. Prone to musculoskeletal injuries, possibly connective tissue disorders.
If these two men live an identical life, and put the same amount of effort into training, the second man still has no hope of making it to the Olympics.
Even doping would only be able to correct for hormonal deficiencies, not the genome-level disadvantages for power performance compared to the other athlete.
A truly "fair" sport would pit competitors against each other who had near-identical genetic and physical traits.
The Olympics is just watching the people who won genetic lotteries.
> A truly "fair" sport would pit competitors against each other who had near-identical genetic and physical traits.
That's what the Olympics is. The men's 100m final pits against each other the fastest 8 men who are in their physical prime, full of fast twitch muscles, with West African descent. With some minor noise.
If you want to watch people from other genotype buckets run 10-50% slower, you can watch the women's event or the Paralympics or, like, the All-Vietnam U-16 event. It seems churlish to complain that not every bucket is on TV at a convenient time for you.
timnetworks 28 minutes ago [-]
Olympics are literally a showcase of the genetic lottery. We can have Testtube Olympics alongside Special Olympics if there is sufficient interest.
hananova 2 minutes ago [-]
No, the olympics are a doping competition, and a meta-competition of “who is better at not getting detected.”
In general, the statement “if they got a medal, they cheated” is true so much of the time that it becomes a sensible default assumption. And it sucks for the few that didn’t cheat.
It’s best of competition, not everybody at the same time on finish line equity gathering.
gherkinnn 28 minutes ago [-]
So the olympic games do pit near-identical competitors against each other.
> The Olympics is just watching the people who won genetic lotteries.
So? The olympic games should be the pinnacle of human performance (fed by their nation's interests). Of course it is lotteries all the way from the genetics, to what country you're born in, right to the national lottery putting money in to sports.
Your alternatives are either a proliferation of categories or random people assembling every four years to roll dice to determine the winner. Neither is exciting.
bigyabai 30 minutes ago [-]
Most sports are a genetic lottery showcase regardless of how many drugs you take.
speedgoose 32 minutes ago [-]
Yeah so athletes with more money and better access to doping products win instead.
Hard pass.
drdaeman 14 minutes ago [-]
At least that produces tangible value this way.
Current idea of sports is that athletes wreck themselves for mere glance value (and money to the people who set it up, with a bit trickling down to athletes for enabling it all). Nothing they do is otherwise useful or meaningful for anyone else.
I’d rather watch a live commercial for human enhancement industries. At least that’s something that eventually becomes available to everyone.
kelipso 30 minutes ago [-]
Also will encourage athletes to give themselves long term health issues for short term performance gains.
gavinray 23 minutes ago [-]
I'm of the "your body, your choice" mind
To me the decision to take PED's doesn't feel different than being an alcoholic or having an abortion.
I wouldn't recommend anyone become an alcoholic, but it's their life and people ought to have the freedom of choice.
speedgoose 15 minutes ago [-]
I’m not sure kids in competitive sports will be able to make an informed decision without any pressure.
mindslight 18 minutes ago [-]
Would you think it a poor dynamic if a company offered to pay people a good salary simply to be heavy sustained drinkers, but only for some limited amount of time? I'd say the problem is that the Moloch attractor tends to undermine this lofty ideal of "freedom of choice".
Rekindle8090 24 minutes ago [-]
What's the point of this post? You're missing the forest for the trees. It's like saying racing is driver against driver, not driver and car against driver and car. Motivation has NEVER made up for physical fitness, never will, and never should. The olympics are about the human body first.
gavinray 21 minutes ago [-]
> What's the point of this post?
I don't see the Olympics as a particularly "fair" sport in the first place, in the sense of "fair" meaning "without favoritism" because physical capability is a vast spectrum.
30 minutes ago [-]
konart 1 hours ago [-]
FSB's Second Service are also the ones who deal with the internet shitshow now.
https://theins.press/en/inv/290235 - Lost in translation: How Russia’s new elite hit squad was compromised by an idiotic lapse in tradecraft
https://theins.press/en/inv/287837 - The mob’s humanitarian backdoor: Ramzan Kadyrov’s mafia connections reach deep into German critical infrastructure
alephnerd 1 hours ago [-]
First there was Nemtsov, then there was Navlany. Wonder who's next.
Funny thing is, if 1999 went differently Lukashenka actually had a shot at being in the Kremlin today.
haght 31 seconds ago [-]
[dead]
varispeed 1 hours ago [-]
Imagine if all Russians put their energy into making world a better place, instead of killing their neighbours, raping, stealing and corrupting. Sad.
nullorempty 3 minutes ago [-]
hm, not much would change.
- we'd still see palestine destroyed
- iran bombed
- iraq bombed
- lybia bombed
- afganistan bombed
- lebanon bombed
Imagine if all coutries would stop doint it. That would make a difference.
throwaway27448 33 minutes ago [-]
Ghee, i wonder what media you consume
mindslight 10 minutes ago [-]
Obviously something on the hyperbolic sensationalist side, but closer to the truth than the simplistic contrarianism peddled by Russian propaganda. FWIW your comment is the type that makes me go back and upvote GP.
stephbook 21 minutes ago [-]
Please share it with us.
Svoka 55 minutes ago [-]
That is a quintessential part of russia through the history of that country. Conquer, oppress, loot. Medieval imperialism brought to modern age.
lifestyleguru 58 minutes ago [-]
The west is secretly in love with this malevolence, that's why.
Svoka 56 minutes ago [-]
Yup, they call it 'mysterious russian soul', while it just a blatant disregard to human life
2. It's unclear to this day who actually slightly poisoned Navalny and to what end.
3. As of last week we have on camera confession [2] from Navalny's FBK's Leonid Volkov [1] that it's very disappointing that USAID money is no more. Video's in russian but you are, sure at least care and capable to translate it with AI, and if not even that don't even bother raise your propagandized brainwashed takes.
I have nothing to say about OP linked site other than that it's trashcan of lies.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Volkov_(politician) [2] https://www.jpg.wtf/c54omx.mp4
Here is what I mean:
Suppose that two men are born, with identical brains, but very different bodies. Both of them have a single desire: to be the fastest sprinter in the world.
Man A)
- Predominantly fast-twitch muscle fiber composition
- Possesses ACTN3 RX genotype [0]
- Testosterone, Growth Hormone, IGF-1 levels at the very upper end of reference range
Man B)
- Predominantly slow-twitch muscle fiber composition
- Possesses ACTN3 XX genotype
- Clinically deficient values of Testosterone, Growth Hormone, IGF-1. Prone to musculoskeletal injuries, possibly connective tissue disorders.
If these two men live an identical life, and put the same amount of effort into training, the second man still has no hope of making it to the Olympics.
Even doping would only be able to correct for hormonal deficiencies, not the genome-level disadvantages for power performance compared to the other athlete.
A truly "fair" sport would pit competitors against each other who had near-identical genetic and physical traits.
The Olympics is just watching the people who won genetic lotteries.
[0]: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11014841/
That's what the Olympics is. The men's 100m final pits against each other the fastest 8 men who are in their physical prime, full of fast twitch muscles, with West African descent. With some minor noise.
If you want to watch people from other genotype buckets run 10-50% slower, you can watch the women's event or the Paralympics or, like, the All-Vietnam U-16 event. It seems churlish to complain that not every bucket is on TV at a convenient time for you.
In general, the statement “if they got a medal, they cheated” is true so much of the time that it becomes a sensible default assumption. And it sucks for the few that didn’t cheat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAdG-iTilWU
> The Olympics is just watching the people who won genetic lotteries.
So? The olympic games should be the pinnacle of human performance (fed by their nation's interests). Of course it is lotteries all the way from the genetics, to what country you're born in, right to the national lottery putting money in to sports.
Your alternatives are either a proliferation of categories or random people assembling every four years to roll dice to determine the winner. Neither is exciting.
Hard pass.
Current idea of sports is that athletes wreck themselves for mere glance value (and money to the people who set it up, with a bit trickling down to athletes for enabling it all). Nothing they do is otherwise useful or meaningful for anyone else.
I’d rather watch a live commercial for human enhancement industries. At least that’s something that eventually becomes available to everyone.
To me the decision to take PED's doesn't feel different than being an alcoholic or having an abortion.
I wouldn't recommend anyone become an alcoholic, but it's their life and people ought to have the freedom of choice.
https://meduza.io/en/news/2026/04/16/report-fsb-unit-linked-...
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2026/04/15/russian-websites-b...
https://theins.press/en/inv/290235 - Lost in translation: How Russia’s new elite hit squad was compromised by an idiotic lapse in tradecraft https://theins.press/en/inv/287837 - The mob’s humanitarian backdoor: Ramzan Kadyrov’s mafia connections reach deep into German critical infrastructure
Funny thing is, if 1999 went differently Lukashenka actually had a shot at being in the Kremlin today.
Imagine if all coutries would stop doint it. That would make a difference.
Oh reeeaaaaally? Interesting comment history you have too.